I only only imagine how many man-hours went into actually turning the Yamato into a functional ship. I don't know, it just seems a little disrespectful when Wargaming pulls a Soviet battleship out of thin air that can go toe-to-toe with the Yamato. I understand what a long, painful process it is to go from a design that looks like it should work and an actually functioning device. I think it's a nitpick of mine because I am an engineer. That's certainly a valid opinion to have! Work started on the hull of Montana, but she was converted to Midway early in construction. What do you think? Am I dissing your favorite ship? Did I miss the design study that shows a complete design on something I gave one star to? Do you care whether a ship is real or made up by WG? ONE STAR: Bourgogne, Republique, Großer Kurfürst, Conqueror, Kremlin, Henri IV, Hindenburg, Harugumo TWO STARS: Montana, Moskva, Azuma, Zao, Minotaur, Khabarovsk, Hakuryu * ONE STAR: taken from one or more design studies that never approached a mature design, or outright fabricated.įOUR STARS: Yamato, Worcester, Des Moines, Salem, Daring, Yueyang, Gearing, Shimakaze, Midway ** TWO STARS: mature, single design, but construction never started. *** THREE STARS: ship design was completed to the point that construction started, but never entered service.
**** FOUR STARS: ship entered active service of a Navy. I then gave each ship a legitimacy rating, as follows: where did these come from? I took a look at all the tier 10 ships including the not-yet released Azuma and Kremlin. With the first look at the impending line of Russian battleships now out, I thought it would be fun to take a look at the most advanced and powerful ships depicted in World of Warships, and ask.
0 kommentar(er)
